Between 2014 and 2035 the U.S. Air Force is set to become a new force that looks very different than it does at present. As the military service defined by its platforms—fighters, bombers, airlifters, refuelers, surveillance and reconnaissance and command and control—the new Air Force will begin to look more and more like the service from whence it came: the Army. In contrast to the present Air Force, the Army is defined by its personnel, not weapon systems. The soldier is the weapon with a mantra of “boots on the ground.” As the Air Force transforms away from a weapon system-centric force, dramatic change will occur. Airmen will be the focus, and the mantra may well be reminiscent of the Terminator series, “Skynet is watching.”
The Air Force has, since its inception, been defined not by Airmen, but by airplanes. Thus, Eddie Rickenbacker, a famous race-car driver and fighter pilot, came to epitomize the daring of the new age of flight. Charles Lindbergh was also heralded for his amazing feat of stamina and courage for being the first to cross the Atlantic Ocean in an airplane. Apart from these icons, however, Americans and the early Air Force focused on technology. There was a desire for airplanes that were bigger, faster and more powerful. Chuck Yeager, perhaps the Air Force and the nation’s most famous test pilot, was idolized for his efforts to push aircraft to their limits in speed and altitude.
For the Air Force, the onset of the Cold War and the existential threat posed by the Soviet Union served as the impetus to heavily invest in the development of a technologically superior air force. President Eisenhower used the service as an inexpensive hedge against the Soviet Union with the nuclear force representing the guarantor of American sovereignty. This led to the rise of the bomber barons and the focus on the long-range bomber as the single most important platform in the nation’s defense. During the Cold War, bomber generals ruled the Air Force. The culmination of a focus on long-range strike was the B-2 stealth bomber. However, as the Cold War ended, the bomber barons were cast aside and a new platform rose to prominence.
The “fighter mafia,” led by Col John Boyd and General Wilbur “Bill” Creech, focused on more-capable fighter aircraft, and focused training on preparation for aerial combat. Boyd eschewed bigger and faster for smaller and more maneuverable. The F-16 and F-15, both incredibly capable fourth-generation aircraft, and associated smart weapons, made the fighter the weapon of choice from operation Desert Storm to Enduring Freedom. The ability to send a single smart bomb through a specified window was a fundamental breakthrough in the advancement of technology in warfare. Since precision required far smaller bomb loads to accomplish a single mission, fighter pilots were able to rise within the Air Force to a level of dominance they had never previously achieved. The development of the F-22 Raptor represents this focus on the fighter. No other fighter on earth can touch it, even as Russia and China are attempting to develop their own fifth-generation fighters.
While Operation Desert Storm (January-April 1991) was ostensibly the first post–Cold War conflict, the U.S. Air Force never left the Middle East. Rather, Airmen and their fighters stayed behind to enforce no-fly zones over Iraq (1991-2003). When the United States responded to the attacks of September 11, 2001 (Operation Enduring Freedom), fighters again played a visible role in the opening attacks on the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. In more than a decade of operations in Afghanistan, air support to troops on the ground played a critical role in American success. When Operation Iraqi Freedom began in March 2003, precision-guided munitions delivered by fighter aircraft again played an important role in combat, as they would throughout the conflict (2003-2010). This period of heavy fighter use also set the stage for change.
The larger “Global War on Terror” led to the rise of the remotely piloted aircraft (RPA), leading many to believe the future of the Air Force would be pilotless. While RPAs play a prominent role in contemporary operations, they represent only a small part of the future Air Force. Other concepts like big data, cloud computing, ubiquitous sensors, quantum computing and improvements in theater command and control are less visible, but more important. The difficult nature of sifting and cataloging terabytes of surveillance and reconnaissance data and delivering actionable intelligence to the warfighter is driving the development of bigger data pipes and bringing more computing power to the problem.
For more details, visit nationalinterest.org